Replacing animal testing in the UK

Animals are still used to test whether new medicines and chemicals are safe. In November 2025 the UK set out a strategy to replace these tests with dated aims, while 2025 figures showed fewer procedures overall but more experiments on dogs, primates and birds.

Updated 15 October 2026 (3 minute read)

  1. The Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act sets up licensing
  2. The FDA announces its plan for monoclonal antibodies
  3. The UK publishes its strategy to replace animals in science
  4. The Home Office reports the 2025 procedure figures

Summary

A hand holding a clear organ on a chip device with coloured channels

Dig deeper

Ethical issues

PrincipleHow it applies here
AutonomyA volunteer with capacity needs to know the risks before a first dose. The government plans guidance by the end of 2026 letting first in human trials of biological medicines with no relevant animal model rely on non animal data alone, though few alternatives are fully validated.
BeneficenceThe case for animal work rests on patient benefit, because animal data help predict how a drug is absorbed, spread and cleared. The strategy accepts this cannot yet be fully predicted without animal data, so it targets a cut of at least 35% in those studies.
Non maleficenceApplicants must state the predicted harm and benefits of their work, and the Secretary of State weighs suffering against outcome in a harm and benefit analysis. Patient benefit justifies the harm, and 73% of experimental dog procedures in 2025 were for regulatory purposes.
JusticeAlternatives must be validated and accepted by regulators before they can replace tests regulators require, so the pace depends on that step. Patients waiting for new medicines carry part of the cost of slow change.

Interview questions

  • What do you know about the 3Rs, and what does each one ask a researcher to do?
  • What happened when the UK government published its strategy in November 2025?
  • What do you know about the Home Office figures for 2025, and why do the totals hide the rise in some species?
  • You are a junior researcher and you see a colleague repeating a dog study that a validated computer model could now replace. What do you do?
  • What happened when the FDA announced its plan in April 2025?
  • Researchers say some questions still need whole animals, and welfare groups say the pace is too slow. What is the strongest argument on each side, and where do they actually disagree?
  • What do you know about how the Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986 licenses research?

Sources

  1. legislation.gov.uklegislation.gov.uk/…/contents
  2. crueltyfreeinternational.orgcrueltyfreeinternational.org/…/government-must-speed-up-implementation-of-animal-testing-st
  3. understandinganimalresearch.org.ukunderstandinganimalresearch.org.uk/…/alternatives-to-animal-research
  4. nc3rs.org.uknc3rs.org.uk/…/the-3rs
  5. fda.govfda.gov/…/fda-announces-plan-phase-out-animal-testing-requirement-mono
  6. GOV.UKgov.uk/…/animal-testing-to-be-phased-out-faster-as-uk-unveils-roadmap
  7. GOV.UKgov.uk/…/annual-statistics-of-scientific-procedures-on-living-animals
  8. GOV.UKgov.uk/…/replacing-animals-in-science-a-strategy-to-support-the-devel
  9. aol.comaol.com/…/tech-replace-animal-testing-almost-130002000.html
  10. fda.govfda.gov/…/fda-updates-regulations-advance-innovative-alternatives-anim
  11. medicaldaily.commedicaldaily.com/…/fda-rule-nonclinical-testing-animal-alternatives-drug-safety
  12. legislation.gov.uklegislation.gov.uk/…/5A
  13. legislation.gov.uklegislation.gov.uk/…/5B

Photo: NASA Headquarters and Emulate, public domain, via Wikimedia Commons, colour altered.

How to answer these is in the course

The Interview Masterclass teaches you how to answer, then puts you in front of mock panels marked by more than one mentor. Our offer rate is 93% across all cycles since 2022.

More NHS hot topics, medical ethics case studies and medical school interview questions are in AlphaMED Resources, which we add to and update through the application cycle.