Paternalism

Paternalism is overriding or limiting a person's choice for their own good.

Updated 19 October 2026 (1 minute read)

Summary

  • Paternalism is interfering with someone's choices to protect them from harm to themselves, rather than to protect other people.
  • Soft paternalism is the view that interference is justified only to check that a person is acting voluntarily and with knowledge, so once they understand the risks they must be allowed to go ahead.
  • Hard paternalism holds that, at least sometimes, it may be permissible to prevent someone from acting even when they know the risks.
  • Paternalism sits in tension with autonomy, because protecting someone's welfare can mean overriding their right to decide.
  • In medicine the question usually turns on capacity, which is judged one decision at a time.

In practice

Interview questions

  • What do you know about the difference between soft and hard paternalism?
  • A patient with capacity decides to leave hospital against medical advice, and you think they are making a mistake. What would you do?
  • Can overriding someone's choice ever be justified for their own good, and what are the strongest arguments against it?

Sources

  1. plato.stanford.eduplato.stanford.edu/…/paternalism
  2. legislation.gov.uklegislation.gov.uk/…/1

How to answer these is in the course

The Interview Masterclass teaches you how to answer, then puts you in front of mock panels marked by more than one mentor. Our offer rate is 93% across all cycles since 2022.

More NHS hot topics, medical ethics case studies and medical school interview questions are in AlphaMED Resources, which we add to and update through the application cycle.